|
|
|
À̼ö¹Ì ( Lee Su-Mi ) - Yonsei University Graduate School Department of Nursing
ÀÌÁøÇý ( Lee Jin-Hae ) - Yonsei University Graduate School Department of Nursing ȲÀ¯°æ ( Hwang Yu-Gyeong ) - Yonsei University Graduate School Department of Nursing °íÀϼ± ( Ko Il-Sun ) - Yonsei University College of Nursing
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify trends of nursing concept development in Korean journal papers to improve accurate understanding of nursing concepts.
Methods: A systematic review of 216 concept development articles published from 1970 to 2018 that met the inclusion criteria was conducted using Research Information Sharing Service (RISS) databases.
Results: The most common method of concept development was Walker and Avant¡¯s concept analysis method, identified in 139 (64.3%) of the 216 studies, followed by 48 examples of hybrid models (22.2%) and 15 examples of evolutionary methods (6.9%). Chinn and Kramer¡¯s method, Norris¡¯s clarification, Wilson¡¯s method, and others were also used. The concepts of ¡°spirituality¡± and ¡°fatigue¡± were most frequently analyzed. Among the 139 studies that used Walker and Avant¡¯s concept analysis method, 127 studies (91.4%) applied all the recommended steps; the others applied the recommended steps partially, omitting description of model cases/additional cases, antecedents/consequences, and empirical indicators. Among the studies using the hybrid model, among two (5.7%) did not describe attributes, three (8.5%) did not provide definitions, and 16 (45.7%) did not present empirical indicators in the final stage.
Conclusion: Among concept development studies published in Korean journals, Walker and Avant¡¯s concept analysis method is most commonly used. In case of most studies using Walker and Avant¡¯s method a suitable concept analysis process is applied, but in case of other studies using the other concept development method, a suitable concept analysis process is not applied. Therefore, a suitable concept analysis process must be applied for concept development in nursing research.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
°³³äÇü¼º, ¹®Çå°íÂû
Concept Formation, Systematic Review
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|